
Motivation and a diverse network of people and capabilities can go a long way, then add in digital skills and winning steak… and you have: scattered spider!
There’s a big difference between zero day spraying the internet and planting webshells or copying someone’s open S3 bucket and say…. doxing staff, their families and attacking them and their assets in the real and digital worlds.
I think people won’t broadly grasp the effects that can be achieved (harm) when the adversary is motivated, dedicated, capable, resourced and has very little moral qualms.
There is no magic bullet to defend against an adversary like this, you need a whole of organisation defence (and to pursue even more than that!).
I’ve used GROK to create a threat assessment, I don’t think it’s done too bad to be honest:
Threat Analysis: Scattered Spider
Overview
Scattered Spider, also known as UNC3944, Octo Tempest, Muddled Libra, Scatter Swine, and Starfraud, is a financially motivated cybercriminal group active since at least 2022. Renowned for sophisticated social engineering tactics, the group targets large organizations across multiple sectors, including telecommunications, hospitality, healthcare, and technology, to perpetrate data extortion, ransomware deployment, and other malicious activities. Their affiliation with ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) operations such as ALPHV/BlackCat and, more recently, RansomHub underscores their adaptability and impact on the cyberthreat landscape.
Key Characteristics: Young operatives (ages 19–22), primarily English-speaking, based in the US and UK, with a loose, fluid structure that complicates attribution and takedown efforts.
Tactics, Techniques, and Procedures (TTPs)
Scattered Spider’s TTPs are characterized by advanced social engineering, exploitation of legitimate tools, and rapid adaptation to countermeasures. Below is a detailed breakdown aligned with the MITRE ATT&CK framework where applicable:
1. Initial Access
- Phishing and Smishing (T1566): Broad email and SMS campaigns using victim-specific domains mimicking legitimate SSO portals (e.g., Okta) to steal credentials.
- Vishing (Voice Phishing): Impersonating IT or helpdesk staff to trick employees into disclosing credentials or installing remote access tools. Attackers often use American-accented speakers to enhance credibility.
- SIM Swapping: Convincing cellular carriers to transfer a target’s phone number to attacker-controlled SIM cards, intercepting MFA codes.
- MFA Bombing (Push Fatigue, T1621): Overwhelming users with MFA notifications to induce accidental approval.
2. Execution and Persistence
- Legitimate Remote Access Tools (T1219): Use of tools like AnyDesk, TeamViewer, ScreenConnect, Splashtop, Pulseway, Tailscale, and Ngrok for remote monitoring and management.
- Creation of Virtual Machines (T1583.005): Establishing Azure VMs or modifying cloud infrastructure to maintain persistence.
- Account Creation (T1136): Registering new accounts or MFA devices to ensure continued access post-compromise.
3. Privilege Escalation and Credential Access
- Mimikatz and Secret Dump (T1003): Extracting credentials from compromised systems.
- CyberArk Exploitation: Decrypting and using credentials stored in CyberArk vaults via custom scripts.
- Golden SAML Attacks (T1606): Adding rogue federated identity providers to Azure AD for privileged access.
4. Defense Evasion
- Living Off the Land (LotL, T1218): Leveraging legitimate system tools like PowerShell for reconnaissance and execution to evade detection.
- Bring Your Own Vulnerable Driver (BYOVD, T1068): Using vulnerable drivers to disable endpoint detection and response (EDR) tools.
- Monitoring Remediation Efforts (T1114): Joining incident response calls and monitoring Slack, Microsoft Teams, or Exchange for security team activities.
5. Collection and Exfiltration
- Data Theft from SaaS Applications (T1537): Targeting platforms like Salesforce, AWS, GCP, and CrowdStrike for sensitive data.
- Cloud Syncing Tools (T1530): Using legitimate tools like Airbyte and Fivetran to exfiltrate data to attacker-controlled cloud servers.
- Exfiltration to Third-Party Sites (T1567): Transferring data to U.S.-based data centers or MEGA.nz.
6. Impact
- Ransomware Deployment (T1486): Using ALPHV/BlackCat, RansomHub, or Qilin ransomware to encrypt files post-exfiltration.
- Data Extortion: Threatening to leak stolen data on dark web forums or ALPHV’s leak site if ransoms are unpaid.
- ACH Fraud: Modifying Automated Clearing House (ACH) information to divert payments to attacker-controlled accounts.
Note: Scattered Spider’s TTPs evolve rapidly, with new techniques observed quarterly, necessitating continuous monitoring and adaptation of defenses.
Countermeasures and Mitigations
Effective defense against Scattered Spider requires a multi-layered approach focusing on user awareness, technical controls, and proactive threat hunting. The following mitigations are aligned with CISA, FBI, and NIST recommendations:
1. Strengthen Authentication
- Implement phishing-resistant MFA using FIDO/WebAuthn or PKI-based solutions to mitigate SIM swapping and MFA bombing.
- Enforce strong password policies per NIST standards and limit password reuse across accounts.
- Use hardware tokens for MFA to reduce reliance on SMS-based verification.
2. Enhance Employee Training
- Conduct regular cybersecurity awareness training to educate employees on recognizing phishing, vishing, and smishing attempts.
- Implement challenge-response protocols for helpdesk interactions to verify user identities before resetting credentials or MFA tokens.
3. Improve Network Security
- Segment networks to limit lateral movement and restrict access to sensitive systems.
- Disable unused ports and protocols and restrict Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP) usage.
- Deploy application allowlisting to control execution of remote access tools.
4. Enhance Monitoring and Detection
- Implement continuous monitoring with tools like Extended Detection and Response (XDR) to detect abnormal activity.
- Monitor for cloned login portals and impersonating domains using brand protection services.
- Use log analysis and threat hunting frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK to identify Scattered Spider TTPs.
5. Privileged Access Management (PAM)
- Deploy PAM solutions to secure and monitor privileged accounts, reducing the risk of credential theft.
- Restrict access to internal IT documentation to prevent attackers from exploiting system knowledge.
6. Incident Response and Recovery
- Maintain offline backups to ensure data recovery without paying ransoms.
- Develop and test an incident response plan to quickly contain and eradicate intrusions.
- Engage with law enforcement (e.g., FBI, CISA) to share intrusion details and support investigations.
Recommendation: Prioritize user- and identity-focused mitigations, as Scattered Spider heavily exploits human vulnerabilities and credential-based access. Privileged Account Management and strong MFA can mitigate over 50% of their techniques.
Notable Incidents
- MGM Resorts and Caesars Entertainment (2023): Ransomware attacks causing $100M in losses for MGM, attributed to Scattered Spider’s social engineering and ALPHV/BlackCat ransomware.
- Marks & Spencer (2025): Recent attack disrupting online services via phishing and ransomware, highlighting ongoing threat.
- Okta, Coinbase, Reddit (2022–2023): Credential theft and data breaches via phishing and vishing campaigns.
Conclusion
Scattered Spider remains a formidable cyberthreat due to its sophisticated social engineering, rapid TTP evolution, and affiliations with RaaS groups like RansomHub. Organizations must adopt a proactive, intelligence-driven defense strategy, emphasizing robust authentication, employee training, and continuous monitoring. By aligning defenses with Scattered Spider’s known TTPs and leveraging frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK, defenders can reduce the risk of compromise and mitigate potential impacts.
For further details on mitigations, refer to CISA’s Cybersecurity Advisory: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories and FS-ISAC recommendations at https://www.fsisac.com/resources.
and then what about them is unique? Because I think here is something that’s important. This adversary is not typical in my eyes….
Scattered Spider: Unique Threat Characteristics
Overview
Scattered Spider, also known as UNC3944, Octo Tempest, Muddled Libra, Scatter Swine, and Starfraud, is a financially motivated cybercriminal group that stands out among other cyberthreats due to its unique operational tactics, organizational structure, and adaptability. While many cybercriminal groups rely on automated exploits or standardized ransomware campaigns, Scattered Spider leverages advanced social engineering, a youthful and fluid workforce, and strategic affiliations to execute highly targeted and impactful attacks. Below is a detailed analysis of what differentiates Scattered Spider from other threats.
Key Differentiators
Scattered Spider’s distinct characteristics set it apart from traditional cyberthreat actors, including state-sponsored groups, other ransomware gangs, and opportunistic cybercriminals. These differences are rooted in their tactics, techniques, procedures (TTPs), and operational model:
- Advanced Social Engineering Expertise:
- Unlike many threat actors who rely heavily on phishing emails with malicious attachments or exploit kits, Scattered Spider excels in multi-channel social engineering, including vishing (voice phishing), smishing (SMS phishing), and MFA bombing (push fatigue attacks, T1621).
- Their operatives, often young and English-speaking, impersonate IT staff or helpdesk personnel with convincing American or British accents, enabling them to bypass employee skepticism and extract credentials or install remote access tools.
- Unique Tactic: They engage in SIM swapping by manipulating cellular carriers to intercept MFA codes, a technique less commonly used by other ransomware groups due to its complexity and reliance on human interaction.
- Contrast: Groups like LockBit or Conti primarily use automated phishing or exploit vulnerabilities like Log4j, requiring less direct human manipulation.
- Youthful and Fluid Workforce:
- Scattered Spider’s operatives are notably young (ages 19–22), often described as “script kiddies on steroids” due to their technical proficiency combined with audacious tactics.
- Their loose, decentralized structure allows them to operate with fluidity, quickly adapting to law enforcement actions or defensive measures. This contrasts with more hierarchical groups like REvil or nation-state actors like APT28.
- Unique Tactic: Their youth enables them to blend into online communities, exploit insider knowledge (e.g., via social media reconnaissance), and leverage modern platforms like Telegram for coordination.
- Contrast: Traditional cybercrime syndicates often rely on older, more experienced operatives with rigid roles, limiting their agility.
- Heavy Use of Legitimate Tools (Living Off the Land):
- Scattered Spider extensively uses legitimate remote access tools (e.g., AnyDesk, TeamViewer, Splashtop, Tailscale, Ngrok) and system utilities (e.g., PowerShell) to evade detection, a technique known as Living Off the Land (LotL, T1218).
- They exploit enterprise tools like CyberArk vaults or cloud platforms (AWS, Azure, Salesforce) to escalate privileges and exfiltrate data, blending malicious activity with normal operations.
- Unique Tactic: Their use of cloud syncing tools (e.g., Airbyte, Fivetran) for data exfiltration to legitimate cloud services is less common among other groups, which often rely on custom malware or encrypted channels.
- Contrast: Groups like Ryuk or Maze typically deploy custom malware, making their activities more detectable by endpoint detection and response (EDR) systems.
- Rapid TTP Evolution and Adaptability:
- Scattered Spider demonstrates an unusually fast adaptation cycle, integrating new techniques quarterly based on victim defenses or law enforcement actions.
- They actively monitor incident response efforts by infiltrating communication channels (e.g., Slack, Microsoft Teams) or joining remediation calls, allowing them to counter defenses in real-time.
- Unique Tactic: Their shift from ALPHV/BlackCat to RansomHub following law enforcement disruptions in 2024 showcases their ability to pivot to new ransomware-as-a-service (RaaS) affiliates seamlessly.
- Contrast: Other groups, such as Clop, tend to stick to established TTPs, making them more predictable and easier to defend against over time.
- Strategic RaaS Affiliations:
- Scattered Spider’s partnerships with high-profile RaaS operations like ALPHV/BlackCat and RansomHub provide access to advanced ransomware strains and leak sites, amplifying their impact.
- Unlike standalone ransomware gangs, their role as an initial access broker (IAB) allows them to focus on infiltration while outsourcing encryption and extortion to RaaS partners.
- Unique Tactic: Their ability to operate as both an IAB and a full-cycle attacker (handling exfiltration, encryption, and extortion) gives them flexibility not seen in groups like Qilin, which focus solely on ransomware deployment.
- Contrast: Many cybercrime groups either develop their own ransomware or operate independently, limiting their scalability compared to Scattered Spider’s collaborative model.
- Targeting High-Value Sectors with Precision:
- Scattered Spider targets large organizations in sectors like hospitality, telecommunications, healthcare, and technology, focusing on entities with high revenue and sensitive data (e.g., MGM Resorts, Okta, Coinbase).
- Their attacks are highly tailored, using victim-specific reconnaissance to craft convincing phishing domains or vishing scripts, unlike the spray-and-pray tactics of groups like Emotet.
- Unique Tactic: Their use of ACH fraud (modifying Automated Clearing House details) alongside ransomware and extortion is a rare combination, maximizing financial gain.
- Contrast: Opportunistic actors like Dridex cast a wider net, targeting smaller businesses with less sophisticated attacks.
Key Takeaway: Scattered Spider’s blend of sophisticated social engineering, youthful agility, legitimate tool exploitation, and strategic RaaS affiliations makes them a uniquely persistent and adaptable threat compared to traditional cybercrime groups.
Implications for Defenders
Scattered Spider’s unique characteristics require defenders to prioritize:
- User-Centric Defenses: Robust employee training to recognize vishing and smishing, coupled with phishing-resistant MFA (e.g., FIDO/WebAuthn), to counter social engineering.
- Behavioral Monitoring: Deploy XDR solutions to detect LotL techniques and unusual activity in legitimate tools.
- Threat Intelligence: Leverage MITRE ATT&CK mappings and real-time intelligence from CISA or FS-ISAC to track Scattered Spider’s evolving TTPs.
- Incident Response Vigilance: Secure communication channels and monitor for attacker infiltration during remediation efforts.
For further details, refer to CISA’s Cybersecurity Advisory: https://www.cisa.gov/news-events/cybersecurity-advisories.
Conclusion
Scattered Spider distinguishes itself from other cyberthreats through its masterful social engineering, youthful and agile workforce, heavy reliance on legitimate tools, rapid TTP evolution, strategic RaaS affiliations, and precise targeting of high-value sectors. These traits make them a formidable and unpredictable adversary, requiring organizations to adopt proactive, intelligence-driven defenses to mitigate their impact.
I would suggest to defend against a threat like this requires a very different mindset to that I find in most orgs today….
Perhaps we should be thinking about this differently! Perhaps we should be taking more notice!